💡 Why this matters: the gap behind the headline
Pornhub’s 2025 Gay Pride Insights dropped a familiar data nugget: the platform published a second annual snapshot focused on gay male porn viewership. That’s cool — except for one glaring thing: lesbian-made or lesbian-starring porn, plus many bi+/trans/non-binary productions, aren’t part of that dataset. Translation: there’s a big hole where the “Lesbian” story should be.
If you care about creators, platform strategy, or audience shifts (and if you read Top10Fans, you probably do), this matters. Missing categories skew what creators see as “demand,” change who gets promoted by algorithms, and shape public takeaways about what people actually watch. This piece unpacks the numbers Pornhub did release, flags the blind spots (hello—lesbian content), and forecasts what to watch next for creators, platforms, and marketers.
I’ll walk through the gender and age splits Pornhub reported, highlight the odd exclusions, connect the dots to platform policy changes and privacy concerns, and end with practical takeaways for creators and analysts. No fluff — just the useful, slightly messy truth.
📊 Data Snapshot: who watched gay porn on Pornhub in 2025 (key metrics)
| 🧑🎤 Segment | 💻 Metric | 📈 Value | 🔍 Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender split | Share of views | Male 53% / Female 47% | Female viewers up by 4% YoY (Pornhub note) |
| Age group — top | Share of views | 18–24: 27% | Largest chunk of total views |
| Under 24 | Likelihood vs average | −4% likelihood | Less likely to watch gay porn than older groups |
| Senior men (65+) | Relative likelihood | +39% likelihood | 65+ men over-index vs younger men |
| Category coverage | Inclusions | Gay male porn only | Lesbian/bi+/trans/non-binary productions excluded |
What this table reveals: Pornhub’s gay-porn audience is nearly split by gender, with a notable uptick in female viewers (+4% YoY). Young adults (18–24) deliver the biggest raw share of views, yet the very youngest cohorts are slightly less likely to watch gay male porn. The outlier is old men (65+), who over-index significantly. Crucially, these numbers only reflect gay male content — meaning the platform’s Pride-branded dataset omits lesbian and many queer-identifying creators, which shapes the narrative you’re reading right now.
😎 MaTitie SHOW TIME
Hi, I’m MaTitie — the author of this post, a man who loves good deals, guilty pleasures, and calls it like I see it.
If you care about privacy, streaming, and access: platforms and regulators are shifting fast. Sites like Pornhub and others have faced new age-verification rules and regional access changes that can cut visible traffic overnight. If you want smoother access for research or creator work, a reliable VPN like NordVPN helps keep things private and fast.
👉 🔐 Try NordVPN now — 30-day risk-free.
This post contains affiliate links. If you buy something through them, MaTitie might earn a small commission.
💡 Why lesbian content being excluded matters (deep dive)
First: scope bias. When a big platform releases themed “insights” but restricts the scope to a single sub-audience (here: gay male porn), media headlines and creator takeaways often generalize those findings across queer porn at large. That’s misleading.
Second: visibility & algorithmic consequences. If Pornhub’s Pride report only pulls gay-male-tagged data, algorithms that prioritize “popular” content may continue to deprioritize lesbian creators — even if real demand for lesbian content exists elsewhere on the site or on other platforms. Fewer signals in an official report equals less promotional weight in feeds and editorial pages.
Third: measurement distortions from policy shifts. Regional moderation and new age-verification laws already change traffic samples. For example, UK rules this year requiring user ID or facial verification have been linked to steep traffic drops for major adult sites, which can shrink or shift sample populations in platform reports [ltn, 2025-10-05]. When platform-level sampling changes, reported percentages may reflect who remains able or willing to browse — not pure underlying demand.
Fourth: privacy, harm, and ethics. High-profile legal stories about non-consensual sharing and revenge porn keep privacy risk in the headlines; the Nathalie Matthews arrest coverage is a reminder that platform data and legal risk overlap — and that creators and researchers should expect churn and takedowns to affect what’s visible publicly [The Sydney Morning Herald via MSN, 2025-10-05].
Fifth: the mental-health and tech factor. Emerging tech — especially AI-generated porn — is changing patterns of consumption and addiction risk; new reporting on AI-porn dependence is a variable creators and platforms will have to monitor carefully as it reshapes supply and demand dynamics [Wired Japan, 2025-10-04].
Bottom line: raw percentages are a starting point, not the full story. Platform policy, regulatory environments, and what’s included/excluded in a dataset change the narrative more than we realize.
🙋 Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Who is Dr Giselle Woodley and why does her view matter?
💬 Dr Giselle Woodley is a sexologist at Edith Cowan University who commented on Pornhub’s report, noting female interest in gay porn and rising interest in trans-inclusive content — useful because expert commentary helps interpret raw platform numbers.
🛠️ Does the UK age-verification crackdown really cut site traffic that much?
💬 Yes — reporting suggests strict verification rules in the UK led to steep traffic drops for big adult sites; that kind of regional shift can distort global platform stats and creator earnings.
🧠 How should creators react if lesbian content feels invisible in platform reports?
💬 Diversify: publish on multiple platforms, build direct-fan channels (mailing lists, private platforms), and lean on platforms that highlight LGBTQ+ creators. Official platform reports are marketing — not a complete market map.
🧩 Final Thoughts…
Pornhub’s 2025 Gay Pride Insights gave us useful slices — gender parity in viewers, a rise in female interest, a big 18–24 share, and older men over-indexing — but the elephant in the room is exclusion. Lesbian and many queer-coded productions weren’t included, so anyone using this report to make content or ad decisions needs to be cautious.
Creators: read these numbers as one signal among many. Platforms and regional policies will continue to shift visibility and traffic. Analysts: always check dataset scope before generalizing. And everyone: privacy, consent, and the rise of AI-generated content are the trends that will reshape both supply and demand in the next 12–24 months.
📚 Further Reading
Here are 3 recent articles from the news pool that add context to platform, privacy, and creator economics:
🔸 OnlyFans promet des fortunes avec de simples photos érotiques : peut-on vraiment gagner des milliers d’euros ?
🗞️ Source: actu – 📅 2025-10-04
🔗 Read Article
🔸 Internetezés, digitális páncélban: egy eszköz látszólag mindenre választ ad – vagy csak felesleges pénzszórás?
🗞️ Source: VG – 📅 2025-10-04
🔗 Read Article
🔸 cb-events 2.3.7
🗞️ Source: PyPI – 📅 2025-10-04
🔗 Read Article
😅 A Quick Shameless Plug (Hope You Don’t Mind)
If you’re creating on OnlyFans, Fansly, or similar platforms — don’t let your content go unnoticed.
🔥 Join Top10Fans — the global ranking hub built to spotlight creators like YOU.
✅ Ranked by region & category
✅ Trusted by fans in 100+ countries
🎁 Limited-Time Offer: Get 1 month of FREE homepage promotion when you join now!
🔽 Join Now 🔽
📌 Disclaimer
This post blends publicly available information with a touch of AI assistance. It’s meant for sharing and discussion purposes only — not all details are officially verified. Please take it with a grain of salt and double-check when needed. If anything weird pops up, blame the AI, not me—just ping me and I’ll fix it 😅.